Acceptance gates
Version the metrics, thresholds, workload, and exclusions that define a defensible release.
INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL EVALUATION FOR AI SYSTEMS
MAKE THE CALL.
KEEP THE EVIDENCE.
Before you approve a model, workflow, or automation, Verahelm tests the decision against what matters in production: quality, cost, latency, and failure behavior. You receive a clear recommendation, the evidence behind it, and the limits that still apply.
- ONE DECISION AT A TIME
- FIXED SCOPE AND PRICE
- NO PUBLIC UPLOADS
PUBLIC INTAKE
What decision is holding up the work?
02 / EMAIL
03 / SCOPE
Choose a service or ask for guidance, then verify your work email. Verification confirms access to the address—not identity or authority.
No files are accepted here. Do not submit code, credentials, customer records, or confidential material.
01 · DECISION FIRST02 · MATCHED COMPARISON03 · FAILURE ACCOUNTING04 · EVIDENCE BOUNDARY05 · NEXT TEST
PUBLIC PROOF / NO EMAIL REQUIRED
Read a complete report before you hire us.
The public sample shows the decision, measurements, checks, failed cases, and unresolved limits. It uses synthetic data and makes no claim about a customer result.
OPEN THE FULL SAMPLE REPORT ↗ Synthetic demonstration · not a customer outcome · print-readyRELEASE INTERPRETATIONCONDITIONAL
Quality evidence supports the candidate in the stated synthetic scope. Runtime remains an open limitation.
- OVERALL ACCURACY
- 80.8 → 93.3%
- HIGH-RISK RECALL
- 66.7 → 100%
- FALSE NEGATIVES
- 03 → 00
- RUNTIME CLAIM
- WITHHELD
- 01 DECISION AND SCOPE
- 02 RESULT MATRIX
- 03 CONTROL CHAIN
- 04 LIMITATION REGISTER
- 05 NEXT DISCRIMINATING TEST
RECURRING PRODUCT / MANAGED ACCESS
Keep one reviewable record for every important AI change.
VH Register is a managed decision-evidence layer. It does not replace tracing or choose for you. It records what was tested, what passed, what failed, what remains uncertain, and when the decision must be revisited.
Decision history
Keep baseline, candidate, exceptions, limitations, and approval state in one legible record.
Regression signal
Compare subsequent runs against the accepted baseline and surface the next discriminating test.
ENGAGEMENT ROUTES / WRITTEN SCOPE
Start with a bounded scope, delivery window, and written quotation.
Automation Map
One workflow model, exception and control map, implementation constraints, and sequenced engineering backlog.
WRITTEN QUOTATIONVH Register
One active decision record, versioned gates, limitation tracking, regression state, and one managed monthly review.
MANAGED PROPOSALSystems Benchmark
One frozen workload, two configurations, matched measurement, failure accounting, and a decision memorandum.
WRITTEN QUOTATIONSpend Assessment
One workload-level cost model covering usage, latency, retries, accepted-result cost, assumptions, and test priorities.
WRITTEN QUOTATIONFindings Validation
Up to ten material claims with evidence tracing, numerical checks, contradiction review, and sampled reproduction.
WRITTEN QUOTATIONEvaluation Harness
One workflow with versioned fixtures, scoring contract, run records, regression reporting, and an operator runbook.
WRITTEN QUOTATIONFees are established only after the decision, workload, evidence boundary, dependencies, and acceptance criteria are understood. Taxes, paid third-party services, travel, regulated-data handling, additional comparators, integrations, remediation, and production deployment are excluded unless the signed scope includes them. A written quotation controls before work begins.
FIT / DISQUALIFICATION
Verahelm works best when one decision can be tested.
Verahelm is useful when one consequential technical decision can be made measurable. It is a poor fit when the desired output is a preordained approval, a guaranteed business outcome, or an undefined transformation program.
- 01
A model, vendor, workflow, or automation choice is blocked by conflicting evidence.
- 02
The team can authorize representative inputs and agree on acceptance criteria.
- 03
Failures, limitations, and a conditional result are more valuable than a polished endorsement.
- 04
The result must be repeatable after the system, workload, or provider changes.
- ×
Certification, legal advice, penetration testing, or a security guarantee.
- ×
A promised speedup, savings figure, accuracy level, or production outcome.
- ×
Public file uploads, unsolicited source review, or work without written authorization.
- ×
A generic dashboard that replaces existing tracing or observability infrastructure.
HOW VERAHELM WORKS
The work is designed to survive review.
Every scope separates observation from inference, keeps contrary evidence, and states where the conclusion stops holding. Private methods remain internal; buyers receive the evidence needed to evaluate the result.
- 01 / FRAMEName the operating decision and acceptance criterion.
- 02 / FREEZEHold workload, environment, and comparison rules constant.
- 03 / TESTMeasure outcomes, controls, exceptions, and failure behavior.
- 04 / DECIDEReport the result, uncertainty, limitations, and next test.
SCOPE ANATOMY / BEFORE DATA MOVES
Agree on the exchange before any private data moves.
Client engagements are managed technical services, not unattended self-service automation. Files move only after an authorized scope defines transfer, retention, ownership, acceptance, and deletion.
READ THE CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT GUIDE ↗01 WHAT CHANGES HANDS?
A written scope, frozen evaluation contract, result matrix, decision memo, limitation register, and next-test recommendation. Exact artifacts vary by service and are agreed before work begins.
02 WHAT DOES VERAHELM NEED?
One blocked operating decision, authorized representative inputs, baseline access when applicable, and a buyer-approved acceptance criterion. Public intake accepts no files.
03 WHY NOT USE AN OBSERVABILITY PLATFORM?
Use one. Verahelm is not a tracing replacement. It is an independent decision layer for a bounded comparison, failure accounting, and the evidence needed to authorize—or withhold—a claim.
04 WHAT IS NOT PROMISED?
No certification, legal opinion, security guarantee, speedup, savings, accuracy level, or production result. A defensible no-go or conditional result remains a valid deliverable.
ONE BLOCKED DECISION / MINIMUM DEFENSIBLE SCOPE